Thanks to the
miracle of modern technology, I have just now been able to view a downstream of
Life Itself – Steve James’
extraordinary documentary about the late, great Roger Ebert – at the same time
the film had its world premiere at the Sundance Film Festival.
I promise to write
about the movie in greater detail further down the road, after I have had a
chance to think about it more and, in all likelihood, view it again. But please
indulge me as I share a few first impressions.
For openers: Roger
and I were not bowling buddies, and I would be grossly overestimating the
intimacy of our relationship if I said we were extremely close confidants. But
our friendship was a long and mutually respectful one. (“I first met my old friend Joe Leydon when he was the
film critic of the Houston Post,” he wrote in 2009. “When we see each other at
the Toronto Film Festival, we are usually the oldest active critics in the room.”)
And we were close enough for me to contact him when I was diagnosed with
prostate cancer a few years back, and for him to offer me not only sympathy and
encouragement, but also a few good laughs as I underwent radiation treatments.
(Roger always had
a great sense of humor – and often made himself the butt of his own jokes. At
one point in Life Itself, you can
hear him remembering his first reaction to a theater poster for Russ Meyer’s
notorious Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill!
“The poster displayed improbably buxom women,” he says, “and I was inside in a
flash.”)
So when I say that
Life Itself offered me a welcome
opportunity to share quality time with an old friend, well, that’s only because
it did. And for that, I am immensely grateful.
I also am grateful
for the honesty and balance of James’ film. And no, I am not talking just about
the way Life Itself details Roger’s
battle with alcoholism, or his sometimes petty, sometimes vitriolic disputes
with fellow critic Gene Siskel. (One of the more fascinating things in the
documentary is an outtake from a taping session where it appears the wordsmiths might eventually come to blows as first one, then the other, flubs a blurb for an
upcoming show.) I am impressed by the way James faces head-on the
long-standing, still-raging dispute over whether Ebert and Siskel somehow “cheapened”
film criticism with their reliance on quick quips and flexible thumbs.
Of
course, I stand firmly on the side of those who will always praise them for raising
the profile of indies and documentaries through their coverage of these and
other “art house” releases on their nationally syndicated program. But Life Itself gives fair time to the counter-argument
posed by the naysayers represented here by Jonathan Rosenbaum (formerly of The
Chicago Reader). It’s not really James’ fault that Rosenbaum comes off as a
snobbish scold.
Another thing: Life Itself very often recalls L.P. Hartley’s oft-quoted line
– “The past is a foreign country: they do things differently there” – as it harkens back to a time when film critics like Roger Ebert, Gene Siskel, Pauline Kael
and Andrew Sarris were influential figures in popular culture, when critics
actually could play vital roles in helping launch and sustain the careers of
great filmmakers. Martin Scorsese (who served as one of the documentary’s
producers) is deeply affecting as he speaks in Life Itself about Roger’s early review of his debut
feature, Who’s That Knocking at My Door?
His heartfelt words make you appreciate
Roger Ebert all the more – but also make you wonder who, if anyone, has the
credibility and influence today to launch the next generation of filmmakers.
After seeing Life Itself, I immediately Tweeted: “A smart and moving tribute to an irreplaceable critic
and a singular human being.” I’m sure Roger could have phrased it
better. (After all, he was Roger Freakin' Ebert.) I wish he were still around to do so. But I guess I’ll just have to
settle for reading, and re-reading, all the wonderful words he left us with. And when even that is not enough... well, we'll always have Life Itself.
